devJuly 10, 2026·GitHub Blog

Better tools made Copilot code review worse. Here’s how we actually improved it.

How migrating Copilot code review to shared Unix-style code exploration tools reduced review cost by reshaping agent workflows around pull request evidence. The post Better tools made Copilot code review worse. Here’s how we actually improved it. appeared first on The GitHub Blog.

Key Takeaways

•How migrating Copilot code review to shared Unix-style code exploration tools reduced review cost by reshaping agent workflows around pull request evidence. The post Better tools made Copilot code review worse
•This story was reported by GitHub Blog, covering developments in the dev space.
•AI advancements continue to reshape industries — read the full article on GitHub Blog for complete coverage.

📖 Continue reading the full article:

Read Full Article on GitHub Blog →

Share this article

X Facebook Reddit ☕ Support

Dev.to

6 Months Later, Nobody Could Read the Code — Including Me

Six months after shipping the BOGO deals app, I opened the codebase to add one small feature and spent 4 days just trying to remember what I'd built. The request was simple. A handful of users wanted push notifications when a new deal dropped in their neighborhood. I'd done notification integrations

Dev.to

Every AI provider fails in its own way. I stopped checking status codes and built an error model instead.

I built an API gateway that routes between OpenAI, Anthropic and Gemini. I figured integrating both providers would be the hard part. It wasn't. Calling their APIs is maybe an afternoon of work each. The hard part showed up later, the first time something went wrong. Early on, my error handling was

Dev.to

Trust Is an Engineering Output

A players' union arrived at the athlete-data platform to investigate how its members' data was being handled. The platform had nothing to hide, its access controls were sound, its data accurate, its sharing rules strictly enforced, and its deletion process reliable. By every internal measure, it ran

Dev.to

Tool calling Returns HTTP 200, But I “Assumed” the Tool Ran — Have You Seen This?

I’ve been building LLM apps and keep running into a really nasty failure mode: The request looks successful (HTTP 200 / response structure is “valid”) The model outputs tool_calls But the UI or the next assistant step behaves like the tool never actually ran (missing info, the model “fills in the b

Discussion

Loading articles...

Better tools made Copilot code review worse. Here’s how we actually improved it.

Key Takeaways

Related Articles

6 Months Later, Nobody Could Read the Code — Including Me

Every AI provider fails in its own way. I stopped checking status codes and built an error model instead.

Trust Is an Engineering Output

Tool calling Returns HTTP 200, But I “Assumed” the Tool Ran — Have You Seen This?

Discussion

Better tools made Copilot code review worse. Here’s how we actually improved it.

Key Takeaways

Related Articles

6 Months Later, Nobody Could Read the Code — Including Me

Every AI provider fails in its own way. I stopped checking status codes and built an error model instead.

Trust Is an Engineering Output

Tool calling Returns HTTP 200, But I “Assumed” the Tool Ran — Have You Seen This?

Discussion

Related Articles

Dev.to
6 Months Later, Nobody Could Read the Code — Including Me
Six months after shipping the BOGO deals app, I opened the codebase to add one small feature and spent 4 days just trying to remember what I'd built. The request was simple. A handful of users wanted push notifications when a new deal dropped in their neighborhood. I'd done notification integrations

Dev.to
Every AI provider fails in its own way. I stopped checking status codes and built an error model instead.
I built an API gateway that routes between OpenAI, Anthropic and Gemini. I figured integrating both providers would be the hard part. It wasn't. Calling their APIs is maybe an afternoon of work each. The hard part showed up later, the first time something went wrong. Early on, my error handling was

Dev.to
Trust Is an Engineering Output
A players' union arrived at the athlete-data platform to investigate how its members' data was being handled. The platform had nothing to hide, its access controls were sound, its data accurate, its sharing rules strictly enforced, and its deletion process reliable. By every internal measure, it ran

Dev.to
Tool calling Returns HTTP 200, But I “Assumed” the Tool Ran — Have You Seen This?
I’ve been building LLM apps and keep running into a really nasty failure mode: The request looks successful (HTTP 200 / response structure is “valid”) The model outputs tool_calls But the UI or the next assistant step behaves like the tool never actually ran (missing info, the model “fills in the b