I built a routing CLI so AI agents don't skip Room migrations, coroutine ownership, and lifecycle boundaries

Coding agents handle "add a field, show it on screen" fine. They consistently miss the Android boundary around it: Room/SQLite migrations that silently corrupt existing rows A refresh coroutine owned by a view callback instead of the ViewModel UI collection that keeps running after the Activity stops Lifecycle/process-death paths nobody retested None of it shows up as a compile error. I built AI-Workflow to make those checks deterministic. You state observable facts about a change and a checked-in registry maps them to required specialist procedures: Task classification: brownfield / android / safety Detected concerns: concurrency, lifecycle, persistence, schema_migration Recommended tier: COMPLEX Required checks: android-persistence-migration-readiness: because detected persistence, schema_migration kotlin-coroutines-readiness: because detected concurrency protected-lifecycle-transaction-review: because detected lifecycle android-runtime-evidence-readiness: because detected lifecycle No LLM judgment in that mapping — it's a registry lookup, same output every run, every agent. Install takes one command, no clone needed: uvx --from git+https://github.com/RanaAhmedHamdy/AI-Workflow.git \ ai-workflow brownfield --platform android --profile safety \ --target /path/to/your-android-app --dry-run There's also a lightweight Safety profile that gives you just the routing + protected-boundary checks without requiring a full feature lifecycle. And a full Android fixture (SQLite migration fallback, ViewModel coroutine ownership, lifecycle-aware Flow collection) with unit tests and debug build verified locally. Pre-v1, Apache-2.0, honest about what's claimed vs unclaimed.