GPT-5.6 Luna on Foundry: PTU Sizing, PayGo vs. PTU + Spillover Pricing
GPT-5.6 Luna on Foundry: PTU Sizing, PayGo vs. PTU + Spillover Pricing A quick note before we start: While this article focuses on GPT-5.6 Luna to make the pricing and PTU calculations concrete, the same methodology applies to other models when their model-specific throughput and pricing values a

GPT-5.6 Luna on Foundry: PTU Sizing, PayGo vs. PTU + Spillover Pricing A quick note before we start: While this article focuses on GPT-5.6 Luna to make the pricing and PTU calculations concrete, the same methodology applies to other models when their model-specific throughput and pricing values are substituted. Provisioned Throughput provides a dedicated, fixed amount of processing capacity exclusively for your model deployment. Unlike Standard/PayGo, it provides a model-specific latency SLA, and its capacity is not shared across tenants. PTU is a good fit for predictable, sustained traffic with consistent latency and high-throughput requirements. PTU quota is model-independent, so the same quota pool can be allocated across supported models. Throughput per PTU remains model- and version-specific. PTU quota is granted per subscription, region, and deployment type. Quota in East US does not carry over to West Europe, and Global Provisioned quota does not carry over to Data Zone Provisioned. Input Description Model and Version The model determines which Input TPM per PTU and output-to-input ratio values to use. Each model has a minimum PTU count and specific PTU throughput. Deployment type The provisioned deployment type: Global Provisioned, Data Zone Provisioned, or Regional Provisioned. Peak RPM The expected peak number of calls per minute sent to the model. Average prompt size The average number of input tokens per request. Average response size The average number of output tokens per request. Cache rate The percentage of input tokens served from the prompt cache. Cached tokens don't consume any PTU capacity. FORMULAS Input TPM = Peak RPM Γ Average input tokens per request Output TPM = Peak RPM Γ Average output tokens per request Effective Input TPM = Input TPM Γ (1 - Cache rate) Normalized TPM = Effective Input TPM + (Output-to-input ratio Γ Output TPM) Estimated PTUs = Normalized TPM / Input TPM per PTU Note: Input TPM is the workload-specific calculated volume, whereas Input TPM per PTU is a model-specific sizing constant. For example, some listed Input TPM per PTU values are 30,000 for GPT-5.6 Luna, 3,000 for GPT-5.6 Terra, and 1,200 for GPT-5.6 Sol. Representative sample: Let's suppose your application sends requests at a peak rate of 1,000 RPM, with an average prompt size of 1,200 tokens and an average response size of 200 tokens, using the gpt-5.6-luna model with a Global Provisioned deployment. Based on the Microsoft Foundry PTU sizing table, gpt-5.6-luna has these constants: GPT-5.6 LUNA SIZING CONSTANT VALUE Input TPM per PTU 30,000 Output-to-input ratio 6 Minimum Global Provisioned deployment 15 PTUs Global Provisioned scale increment 5 PTUs CALCULATION Input TPM = 1,000 Γ 1,200 = 1,200,000 Output TPM = 1,000 Γ 200 = 200,000 Normalized TPM = 1,200,000 + (6 Γ 200,000) = 2,400,000 Estimated PTUs = 2,400,000 / 30,000 = 80 PTUs PTUs deployed = 80 PTUs CALCULATION Input TPM = 1,000 Γ 1,200 = 1,200,000 Effective Input TPM = 1,200,000 Γ (1 - 0.50) = 600,000 Output TPM = 1,000 Γ 200 = 200,000 Normalized TPM = 600,000 + (6 Γ 200,000) = 1,800,000 Estimated PTUs = 1,800,000 / 30,000 = 60 PTUs PTUs deployed = 60 PTUs Peak RPM Prompt size Response size Cache rate Effective Input TPM Output TPM Normalized TPM Estimated PTUs PTUs deployed 1,000 1,200 200 0% 1,200,000 200,000 2,400,000 80.00 80 1,000 1,200 200 50% 600,000 200,000 1,800,000 60.00 60 For this simplified example, each representative prompt is assumed to contain 1,200 tokens. This exceeds the 1,024-token minimum for prompt caching. A cache hit also requires at least the first 1,024 tokens to be identical across requests. Prompt caching is also available for Provisioned Throughput deployments. Cached input tokens don't consume PTU capacity. In this example, caching reduces the calculated requirement from 80 PTUs to 60 PTUsβa reduction of 20 PTUs (25%). Both values are above the 15-PTU minimum and divisible by the 5-PTU scale increment. No additional rounding is required in this example. Rounding would be required if an estimate fell below the 15-PTU minimum or between supported 5-PTU increments; for example, 62.4 PTUs would be rounded up to 65 PTUs. Representative sample: Let's suppose traffic fluctuates between 0 and 2,500 RPM over a typical 24-hour period, with an average input size of 1,200 tokens and an average response size of 200 tokens, using the gpt-5.6-luna model with a Global Standard (pay-as-you-go) deployment. For the 30-day estimate, this daily traffic profile is assumed to repeat every day. We'll also assume that 50% of input tokens are cache reads and the remaining 50% are cache misses. Of all input tokens, 10 percentage points are cache writes, leaving 40 percentage points as regular input that is neither read from nor written to the cache. Prompt caching applies only to input tokens; output tokens are always charged at the regular output-token rate. Illustrative RPM distribution over 24 hours (RPM changes every 4 hours) 2500 β€ ββββββ 2250 β€ ββββββ 2000 β€ ββββββ ββββββ 1750 β€ ββββββ ββββββ 1500 β€ ββββββ ββββββ 1250 β€ ββββββ ββββββ 1000 β€ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββ 750 β€ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββ 500 β€ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββ 250 β€ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββ ββββββ 0 βΌβββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ HOUR β 00β04 β 04β08 β 08β12 β 12β16 β 16β20 β 20β24 RPM β 0 β 500 β 1,000 β 2,500 β 2,000 β 1,000 For Standard/PayGo rates, as of August 27, 2026, the Azure OpenAI pricing page lists these USD rates for gpt-5.6-luna Global Standard: Meter Symbol Price per 1M tokens Regular input P_regular $0.20 Cached input P_cached $0.02 Cache writes P_write $0.25 Output P_output $1.20 50% cache reads + 10% cache writes + 40% regular input = 100% Symbol Description RPM Requests per minute a.i.T, a.o.T Average input and output tokens per request Hours Duration of the batch in hours r_cached, r_write Cache-read and cache-write rates C_batch Total input-and-output token cost for one batch Formula Calculation Total input tokens T_input = RPM Γ a.i.T Γ 60 Γ Hours Cached input tokens T_cached = T_input Γ r_cached Cache-write input tokens T_write = T_input Γ r_write Regular input tokens T_regular = T_input - T_cached - T_write Total output tokens T_output = RPM Γ a.o.T Γ 60 Γ Hours Batch cost C_batch = (T_regularΒ·P_regular + T_cachedΒ·P_cached + T_writeΒ·P_write + T_outputΒ·P_output) / 1,000,000 Each column represents one 4-hour batch on a typical day. The daily traffic profile is assumed to repeat itself for 30 days. Token values are shown in billions (B). Metric 00β04 04β08 08β12 12β16 16β20 20β24 Total per day Batch duration 4 hours 4 hours 4 hours 4 hours 4 hours 4 hours 24 hours RPM 0 500 1,000 2,500 2,000 1,000 β T_regular 0 0.05760B 0.11520B 0.28800B 0.23040B 0.11520B 0.80640B T_cached 0 0.07200B 0.14400B 0.36000B 0.28800B 0.14400B 1.00800B T_write 0 0.01440B 0.02880B 0.07200B 0.05760B 0.02880B 0.20160B T_output 0 0.02400B 0.04800B 0.12000B 0.09600B 0.04800B 0.33600B C_4-hour batch $0.00 $45.36 $90.72 $226.80 $181.44 $90.72 $635.04 30-day token totals: Regular input (T_regular): 24.19200B Cached input (T_cached): 30.24000B Cache writes (T_write): 6.04800B Output (T_output): 10.08000B Estimated pay-as-you-go cost per day: $635.04. Estimated cost per 30-day month: $19,051.20. Estimated cost per 365-day year: $231,789.60. The following Sweden Central PTU rates were retrieved on August 27, 2026, using the Azure Retail Prices API. Sample queries and commands are included in the Appendix as a reference. Tier Retail API rate Monthly equivalent per PTU Hourly PTU $1.00/PTU/hour $720.00 Monthly reservation $260.00/PTU/month $260.00 One-year reservation $2,652.00/PTU/year $221.00 The hourly PTU monthly equivalent assumes 720 hours (30 days). Warning: Hourly, non-reserved PTU is best suited to temporary or uncertain workloads, such as testing, benchmarking, capacity validation, short pilots, or migration exercises. Let's take 250 RPM as the provisioned baseline and use Standard/PayGo spillover for bursts above it. CALCULATION Input TPM = 250 Γ 1,200 = 300,000 Effective Input TPM = 300,000 Γ (1 - 0.50) = 150,000 Output TPM = 250 Γ 200 = 50,000 Normalized TPM = 150,000 + (6 Γ 50,000) = 450,000 Estimated PTUs = 450,000 / 30,000 = 15 PTUs Provisioned baseline = 15 PTUs Time Incoming RPM Normalized TPM Demand 15-PTU Capacity (Normalized TPM) Potential Spillover Demand 00β04 0 0 450,000 0 04β08 500 900,000 450,000 450,000 08β12 1,000 1,800,000 450,000 1,350,000 12β16 2,500 4,500,000 450,000 4,050,000 16β20 2,000 3,600,000 450,000 3,150,000 20β24 1,000 1,800,000 450,000 1,350,000 Incoming traffic βββΆ 15-PTU deployment (450,000 normalized TPM capacity) X X if throttled (HTTP 429) β ββββΆ Automated Spillover to Standard/PayGo deployment if configured Important: Spillover is optional and must be configured either for the provisioned deployment or per request. Once configured, Microsoft Foundry automatically routes eligible requests that the provisioned deployment cannot serveβsuch as requests receiving HTTP 429, 500, or 503βto the associated Standard deployment. Without this configuration, the application must implement its own fallback logic. Pricing option Retail API rate 1 PTU/month 15 PTUs/month 15 PTUs/day (approx.) Hourly PTU $1.00/PTU/hour $720.00 $10,800.00 $360.00 Monthly reservation $260.00/PTU/month $260.00 $3,900.00 $130.00 One-year reservation $2,652.00/PTU/year $221.00 $3,315.00 $108.99 Monthly cost of a yearly PTU reservation is an approximate equivalent calculated by dividing the annual price by 12. Daily cost of a yearly PTU reservation is an approximate equivalent calculated by dividing the annual price by 365. Daily cost of monthly PTU reservation is a rough estimation calculated by dividing the monthly price by 30. Metric 00β04 04β08 08β12 12β16 16β20 20β24 Daily total Incoming RPM 0 500 1,000 2,500 2,000 1,000 β Estimated spillover RPM 0 250 750 2,250 1,750 750 β T_regular 0 0.02880B 0.08640B 0.25920B 0.20160B 0.08640B 0.66240B T_cached 0 0.03600B 0.10800B 0.32400B 0.25200B 0.10800B 0.82800B T_write 0 0.00720B 0.02160B 0.06480B 0.05040B 0.02160B 0.16560B T_output 0 0.01200B 0.03600B 0.10800B 0.08400B 0.03600B 0.27600B C_PTU reservation $21.67 $21.67 $21.67 $21.67 $21.67 $21.67 $130.00 C_PayGo spillover $0.00 $22.68 $68.04 $204.12 $158.76 $68.04 $521.64 C_PTU + spillover $21.67 $44.35 $89.71 $225.79 $180.43 $89.71 $651.64 Daily estimate using a monthly reservation: The $3,900 monthly PTU reservation amortizes to $130.00 per day over a 30-day month. Estimated PayGo spillover is $521.64 per day, for a combined daily estimate of $651.64. 30-day estimate using a monthly reservation: PTU reservation $3,900.00; PayGo spillover $15,649.20; combined cost $19,549.20. 365-day estimate using a one-year reservation: PTU reservation $39,780.00; PayGo spillover $190,398.60; combined cost $230,178.60. Interval amounts are rounded independently. Daily and longer-term totals are calculated using unrounded values. Actual throughput and costs can vary with request concurrency, token-length distribution, caching behavior, model version, regional pricing, and throttling characteristics. Let's take 500 RPM as the provisioned baseline and use Standard/PayGo spillover for bursts above it. CALCULATION Input TPM = 500 Γ 1,200 = 600,000 Effective Input TPM = 600,000 Γ (1 - 0.50) = 300,000 Output TPM = 500 Γ 200 = 100,000 Normalized TPM = 300,000 + (6 Γ 100,000) = 900,000 Estimated PTUs = 900,000 / 30,000 = 30 PTUs Provisioned baseline = 30 PTUs Time Incoming RPM Normalized TPM Demand 30-PTU Capacity (Normalized TPM) Potential Spillover Demand 00β04 0 0 900,000 0 04β08 500 900,000 900,000 0 08β12 1,000 1,800,000 900,000 900,000 12β16 2,500 4,500,000 900,000 3,600,000 16β20 2,000 3,600,000 900,000 2,700,000 20β24 1,000 1,800,000 900,000 900,000 Incoming traffic βββΆ 30-PTU deployment (900,000 normalized TPM capacity) X X if throttled (HTTP 429) β ββββΆ Automated Spillover to Standard/PayGo deployment if configured Important: Spillover is optional and must be configured either for the provisioned deployment or per request. Once configured, Microsoft Foundry automatically routes eligible requests that the provisioned deployment cannot serveβsuch as requests receiving HTTP 429, 500, or 503βto the associated Standard deployment. Without this configuration, the application must implement its own fallback logic. Pricing option Retail API rate 1 PTU/month 30 PTUs/month 30 PTUs/day (approx.) Hourly PTU $1.00/PTU/hour $720.00 $21,600.00 $720.00 Monthly reservation $260.00/PTU/month $260.00 $7,800.00 $260.00 One-year reservation $2,652.00/PTU/year $221.00 $6,630.00 $217.97 Monthly cost of a yearly PTU reservation is an approximate equivalent calculated by dividing the annual price by 12. Daily cost of a yearly PTU reservation is an approximate equivalent calculated by dividing the annual price by 365. Daily cost of monthly PTU reservation is a rough estimation calculated by dividing the monthly price by 30. Metric 00β04 04β08 08β12 12β16 16β20 20β24 Daily total Incoming RPM 0 500 1,000 2,500 2,000 1,000 β Estimated spillover RPM 0 0 500 2,000 1,500 500 β T_regular 0 0 0.05760B 0.23040B 0.17280B 0.05760B 0.51840B T_cached 0 0 0.07200B 0.28800B 0.21600B 0.07200B 0.64800B T_write 0 0 0.01440B 0.05760B 0.04320B 0.01440B 0.12960B T_output 0 0 0.02400B 0.09600B 0.07200B 0.02400B 0.21600B C_PTU reservation $43.33 $43.33 $43.33 $43.33 $43.33 $43.33 $260.00 C_PayGo spillover $0.00 $0.00 $45.36 $181.44 $136.08 $45.36 $408.24 C_PTU + spillover $43.33 $43.33 $88.69 $224.77 $179.41 $88.69 $668.24 Daily estimate using a monthly reservation: The $7,800 monthly PTU reservation amortizes to $260.00 per day over a 30-day month. Estimated PayGo spillover is $408.24 per day, producing a combined daily estimate of $668.24. 30-day estimate using a monthly reservation: PTU reservation $7,800.00; PayGo spillover $12,247.20; combined cost $20,047.20. 365-day estimate using a one-year reservation: PTU reservation $79,560.00; PayGo spillover $149,007.60; combined cost $228,567.60. Interval amounts are rounded independently. Daily and longer-term totals are calculated using unrounded values. Actual throughput and costs can vary with request concurrency, token-length distribution, caching behavior, model version, regional pricing, and throttling characteristics. Period and pricing basis PayGo only 250-RPM baseline (15 PTUs) + spillover Difference vs. PayGo 500-RPM baseline (30 PTUs) + spillover Difference vs. PayGo Daily β monthly reservation $635.04 $651.64 +$16.60 (+2.61%) $668.24 +$33.20 (+5.23%) 30-day month β monthly reservation $19,051.20 $19,549.20 +$498.00 (+2.61%) $20,047.20 +$996.00 (+5.23%) 365-day year β one-year reservation $231,789.60 $230,178.60 β$1,611.00 (β0.70%) $228,567.60 β$3,222.00 (β1.39%) With monthly reservation pricing, PayGo-only is the least expensive option. The 250-RPM baseline costs $498.00 more per 30-day month, while the 500-RPM baseline costs $996.00 more. With one-year reservation pricing, the result reverses. The 250-RPM baseline saves $1,611.00 per year relative to PayGo-only, while the 500-RPM baseline saves $3,222.00 per year. Under this representative traffic profile, the 500-RPM baseline therefore provides the lowest annual cost of the three options. If cost is the primary objective, use PTUs to cover the workload's stable, sustained baseline and route variable or burst traffic to PayGo. Avoid reserving PTUs for capacity that may remain idle; each additional PTU block should save more in PayGo charges than it costs to reserve. That said, cost is not the only objective of PTUs. A correctly sized provisioned deployment also provides dedicated throughput, more predictable latency, a defined latency SLA, and more consistent benchmark results than shared PayGo capacity. The best choice therefore depends on both economics and performance requirements. You are billed on PTUs deployed, not tokens processed: an idle deployment costs exactly the same as a saturated one. Deployments cannot be paused, so under hourly billing, charges stop only when the deployment is deleted. Hourly billing charges per PTU per hour, prorated for partial hours. Use it for benchmarking, evaluation, and short-lived capacity. Azure Reservations discount the effective PTU rate for a one-month or one-year commitment. This is the intended mode for sustained production workloads. Reservations and deployments are created independently, with two consequences: A reservation is a billing discount, not a capacity guarantee. Create the deployment first to confirm capacity exists, then reserve the PTUs you actually deployed. If that deployment is later scaled down or deleted, the reservation keeps billing its original quantity. Deployed PTUs below it become unused coverage; PTUs above it bill at the hourly rate. Scaling down also releases capacity back to the regional pool with no guarantee of reclaiming it, so cycling a production deployment up and down is a poor cost-control strategy. A reservation on a steady deployment is usually cheaper and safer. Provisioned Throughput for Foundry Models Determine PTU sizing for a workload Provisioned Throughput billing and cost management Manage traffic with spillover Azure AI Foundry: from zero to production { curl -s "https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices?api-version=2023-01-01-preview&\$filter=productName%20eq%20%27Azure%20OpenAI%27%20and%20armRegionName%20eq%20%27swedencentral%27" curl -s "https://prices.azure.com/api/retail/prices?api-version=2023-01-01-preview&\$filter=productName%20eq%20%27Azure%20AI%20Foundry%20Provisioned%20Throughput%20Reservation%27%20and%20armRegionName%20eq%20%27swedencentral%27" } | jq -rs ' ["Pricing option", "USD / PTU", "Reservation term"], ( .[].Items[] | select(.skuName == "Provisioned Managed Global") | [ (if .reservationTerm == null then "Hourly" else .reservationTerm end), .retailPrice, (.reservationTerm // "None") ] ) | @tsv'
Key Takeaways
- β’GPT-5.6 Luna on Foundry: PTU Sizing, PayGo vs
- β’This story was reported by Dev.to, covering developments in the dev space.
- β’AI advancements continue to reshape industries β read the full article on Dev.to for complete coverage.
π Continue reading the full article:
Read Full Article on Dev.to βShare this article



